Bean Flying wrote:
... but some of the conclusions he tries to stretch to are questionable.
For example? I would be happy to help if i communicated something in an unrightful way. Or simply if you wish to share information i am not aware of!
Brett H wrote:
... until the deception and he said/she said personal lines were crossed.
Personal? Not the least! Ikon Import (La sorrentina) is a business. Like Bon Trading Co. is a business. Maybe you should see if what they say is about the profit they can make by stating it, or a nonpartisan & neutral report of the history of these coffee makers. (For example, the genericity of the term "Atomic", "Atomic shape" and the likes on one side, and "genuine" "Authentic" on the other side... let alone the tale that the family still makes coffee makers as usual - They closed down Father in 1983, Son in 1989). Once you get that (i give you a hint: it is something about a patent and a trademark), you will understand a lot already. Kind regards from Vienna! (The "Atomic coffee makers popularity" was the first thing i read as i started my research 3 years ago. THANKS!)
Bean Flying wrote:
Interesting human behind the blog too :🙂 Stella oh I mean Mik
PS1: Is "Bean Flying" your real name? Oh, No? In this case, i am sorry to inform that you have an avatar too!!! I sign, Mik i mean Stella, oh i mean Mik etc. PS2: "Interesting" is a compliment to me, so thank you for your appreciation!
